Finanskrisen
The Great Recession
News Home
Home - Index -
Economics - Cataclysm -
Wall Street Bubbles
US Dollar - Houseprices
Martin Wolf about The End Game
Rebalancing the world economy
"This crisis was, first and foremost, about the unsustainability of macro imbalances –
imbalances within and between nations"
Finanskrisens problem löstes genom att socialisera riskerna och efterfrågan
Det behövs ”en uthållig ökning av den privata sektorns efterfrågan”
"alla länder kan inte samtidigt ha exportledd tillväxt"
Martin Wolf intervjuad i SvD/e24 av Johan Myrsten 2010-01-16
– På en mycket djup nivå tror jag att finanskrisens problem löstes genom att socialisera riskerna och efterfrågan. Nästan varje utvecklat land och särskilt de krisdrabbade länderna har enorma budgetunderskott. Statsskulderna kommer troligen att minst fördubblas.
Dessa underskott är ohållbara, och för att ta sig ur krispolitiken behövs ”en uthållig ökning av den privata sektorns efterfrågan”.
Men den efterfrågan ser ut att förbli ”kroniskt svag” trots de extremt låga räntorna, inte minst i euroländer med stora statsfinansiella problem. I det läget blir det mycket svårt att minska budgetunderskotten
Därför hoppas de flesta – inklusive USA, Storbritannien, euroländerna, Japan och Kina – att exporten ska dra i gång deras tillväxt. Men alla länder kan inte samtidigt ha exportledd tillväxt, noterar han bitande.
Obalanserna mellan Kinas överskott och USA:s underskott var väl kända och kritiserade, men de allra flesta ekonomer misslyckades ”med att förstå riktigt hur bräcklig kärnan i världens finanssystem hade blivit.”
– Det var något vi missade. Mycket av tillväxten som var knuten till finanssektorn var en illusion. Det var ett stort misslyckande, för det ledde till den katastrof vi nu ser.
Utvecklingen de närmaste tio åren måste var annorlunda i två grundläggande avseenden, sammanfattar han.
– I Kina måste efterfrågan växa snabbare än produktionen, i stället för tvärtom.
Och i USA, Storbritannien och andra utvecklade länder måste det vara omvänt.
Det räcker med att läsa Martin Wolf
Varför skall vi vanliga dödliga småtyckare anstränga oss, läsa fundera och skriva?
Rolf Englund blog 6/1 2010
As the great bear rally of 2009 runs into the greater Chinese Wall of excess global capacity, it will become clear that we are in the grip of a 21st Century Depression
– more akin to Japan's Lost Decade than the 1840s or 1930s, but nothing like the normal cycles of the post-War era.
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
Posted to John Mauldin's Outside the Box on 4/1 2010
The contraction of M3 money in the US and Europe over the last six months will slowly puncture economic recovery as 2010 unfolds, with the time-honoured lag of a year or so. Ben Bernanke will be caught off guard, just as he was in mid-2008 when the Fed drove straight through a red warning light with talk of imminent rate rises – the final error that triggered the implosion of Lehman, AIG, and the Western banking system.
As the great bear rally of 2009 runs into the greater Chinese Wall of excess global capacity, it will become clear that we are in the grip of a 21st Century Depression – more akin to Japan's Lost Decade than the 1840s or 1930s, but nothing like the normal cycles of the post-War era.
The surplus regions (China, Japan, Germania, Gulf ) have not increased demand enough to compensate for belt-tightening in the deficit bloc (Anglo-sphere, Club Med, East Europe), and fiscal adrenalin is already fading in Europe. The vast East-West imbalances that caused the credit crisis are no better a year later, and perhaps worse.
Household debt as a share of GDP sits near record levels in two-fifths of the world economy. Our long purge has barely begun. That is the elephant in the global tent.
We will be reminded too that the West's fiscal blitz – while vital to halt a self-feeding crash last year – has merely shifted the debt burden onto sovereign shoulders, where it may do more harm in the end if handled with the sort of insouciance now on display in Britain. Yields on AAA German, French, US, and Canadian bonds will slither back down for a while in a fresh deflation scare. Exit strategies will go back into the deep freeze. Far from ending QE, the Fed will step up bond purchases. Bernanke will get religion again and ram down 10-year Treasury yields, quietly targeting 2.5pc.Avslutningsvis verkar det nu som att vi har klarat av den värsta krisen. Vägen tillbaka är dock inte utan risker för bakslag.
Exempelvis kvarstår stora globala obalanser och många länder har problem med sin statsskuld.
Återhämtningen kommer att ta tid, men 2010 blir bättre än 2009.
Stefan Ingves DN Debatt 2009-12-31
The Age of Deleveraging
Total consumer debt is shrinking for the first time on 60 years.
And the decline shows no sign of abating.
John Mauldin 19/12 2009
Arvind Subramanian argues that economics has redeemed itself by rescuing the world economy from the crisis. I agree, but only up to a point.
These extraordinary interventions have not returned the patient to health. They have merely prevented him from dying.
We now must heal five chronic conditions, instead of survive last year’s brutal heart attack.
Martin Wolf, December 29 2009
The rest of the world was inclined to believe that the west, whatever its faults, knew what it was doing, particularly where running a market economy was concerned. But then the teacher failed the examination.
Thirty years of surging growth in private sector leverage, in the balance sheets of the financial sector and in notional profitability of the financial sector in the US and other high-income countries has ended in calamity.
The emergence of massive global current account “imbalances” has proved highly destabilising.
Martin Wolf December 23 2009
After predicting in his 2003 book "The Dollar Crisis" that the U.S. property bubble would trigger a global recession,
Duncan's new book argues that governments will have to keep stimulating their economies because U.S. demand for cheap goods will not return to the halcyon days of the 2003 to 2007 boom.
CNBC 16 december 2009
"The Dollar Crisis: Causes, Consequences, Cures"
Richard Duncan, How Japan financed global reflation
Click here
Having accumulated $2,273bn in foreign currency reserves, China has kept its exchange rate down, to a degree unmatched in world economic history.
China has, as a result, distorted its own economy and that of the rest of the world.
Martin Wolf, FT December 8 2009
Unfortunately, as we have also long known, two classes of countries are immune to external pressure to change policies that affect global “imbalances”: one is the issuer of the world’s key currency; and the other consists of the surplus countries. Thus, the present stalemate might continue for some time.
But the dangers this would create are also evident: if, for example, China’s current account surplus were to rise towards 10 per cent of GDP once again, the country’s surplus could be $800bn (€543bn, £491bn), in today’s dollars, by 2018. Who might absorb such sums?
US households are broken on the wheel of debt, as are those of most of the other countries that ran large current account deficits.
That is why governments are now borrowers of last resort.
Jag tycker det är skriande uppenbart att räntan världen över är för låg och att en större del av stimulanserna borde ske via finanspolitiken. Finanspolitiska Rådets chef Lars Calmfors är inne på liknande tankar:
- Lars Calmfors budskap är: Riksbanken måste agera. Annars hotar en bolånebubbla
Trade imbalances will grow from their current low levels in the months ahead, and this is politically dangerous.
Deficit country economies remain extremely fragile, and even if they avoid a double dip recession their unemployment rates will continue to rise well into next year.
Kevin O'Rourke Eurointelligence 4.12.2009
Kevin O’Rourke is a Professor of Economics at Trinity College Dublin, and a co-organiser of the CEPR’s Economic History Initiative.
There is widespread agreement that one of the root causes of the Great Credit Crisis of 2008 was the interaction between global imbalances and under-regulated financial systems.
A falling dollar is one of the things required to rebalance the world economy, along with a shift in expenditure away from deficit countries towards surplus countries. The fact that the dollar is falling is thus, taken in isolation, a positive development. Nevertheless.....
It seems clear, however, that these pressures will be even greater in Europe, and in particular in the Eurozone.
Barack Obama, president of the US, met Hu Jintao, president of the People’s Republic of China,
This, then, was an opportunity for Mr Obama to tell some brutal truths. I hope he did
Martin Wolf, FT November 17 2009
Our current fiscal and monetary policies have a straightforward cause:
we were contemplating the abyss a year ago.
Even now, our recovery is too weak to reduce unemployment from intolerable levels.
Confronted with these risks, the Federal Reserve and my administration have acted to sustain demand.
if anything, those who warned our stimulus package would prove too small were right.
We faced a slump for a simple reason: the financial crisis we inherited triggered a collapse in US private spending and a sharp rise in private saving. My advisers have told me that between the fourth quarter of 2007 and the second quarter of 2009, the balance between US private income and spending shifted from a deficit of 2.1 per cent of gross domestic product to a surplus of 6.2 per cent
– a swing towards frugality of 8.3 per cent of GDP.
The collapse of our fiscal position is no more than the mirror image of this shift in the balance between private income and spending.
The Fed’s easing is also an inevitable response to the collapse.
“I am president of the US. I am not going to put our economy into a depression, to protect the value of Chinese savings.
After all, nobody in the US asked you to intervene on so massive a scale in currency markets and so accumulate the incredible total of $2,275bn in foreign currency reserves by September of this year, much of it in our currency.
“As Dominique Strauss-Kahn, managing director of the International Monetary Fund, has just pointed out here in Beijing, ‘at the end of the day, higher Chinese domestic demand, along with higher US savings, will help rebalance world demand and assure a healthier global economy for us all’.
The price of oil has reached a new high for 2009,
continuing its recent rise on the back of the weak US dollar and strong US company results.
US crude rose 52 cents to $79.05
BBC 19 October 2009
A year ago the price came close to $150 a barrel
The oil market is volatile at the best of times. But the last year has been extraordinary even by those standards.
A year ago the price came close to $150 a barrel. At that price even many oil producers thought the commodity overpriced.
And yet, some analysts were forecasting $200 a barrel before long and oil producers were under international political pressure to do something.
Producers, however, had such little spare capacity that there was not very much they could do.
Whatever happened to imbalances?
Samuel Brittan, FT October 15 2009
Do you remember all the fuss about international imbalances? China, some of the emerging countries, the oil exporters, Germany and Japan were building up huge current account surpluses, while the US, the UK, Australia, some other European countries such as Spain and Ireland, and central and eastern European countries were enormously in deficit.
In dollar terms the sums seemed huge. For instance, the US had in 2006 a current deficit of $760bn, while by 2008 the Chinese surplus was well over $400bn and that of the “fuel exporters” over $600bn. In relative terms the numbers are much less frightening. At their 2008 peak, on International Monetary Fund estimates, the global imbalances amounted to 2½ per cent of world gross national product, measured by total surpluses or deficits.
Nevertheless, they worried many observers. Indeed, to the extent to which the present recession was even faintly foreseen, it was expected to come from a run on the dollar triggered by these imbalances. We may or may not be seeing the beginning of such a run now, but its timing makes it quite implausible as a recession trigger.
I am afraid I could never see what the fuss was about. International capital flows, which are the counterpart to these imbalances, are a normal feature of a global economy. Some of the fuss was at bottom moralistic. A poor country such as China should not be lending to finance a US consumer boom
America and China have a problem
A very big multi-trillion dollar problem that shows no sign of going away whatever the financial crisis throws at it.
Patrick Allen Senior News Editor, CNBC 12 Oct 2009
China's huge holding of US dollars has been built up over years as US consumers snapped up Chinese goods and Beijing built an economic power house off the back of those exports.
This relationship was at the heart of the global growth story in the build up to the 2007 credit crisis and ultimately led to a global imbalance that no one would now deny needs to be, as the economists would put it, rebalanced. But when you owe a country around $2 trillion, actually making this happen is not easy even if the will is on both sides, which it is not.
Faced with the prospect of having to raise trillions of dollars via the bond markets over his first term Obama is looking for an exit strategy from his trade deficit at a time when his budget deficit is set to balloon to historic levels.
The authorities in Beijing view this shift in policy from Washington with trepidation. They say if you owe the bank $100 then it is your problem but if you owe the bank $1 million then it is their problem. When the numbers you are owed are close to $2 trillion then you have an unprecedented problem.
This crisis was, first and foremost, about the unsustainability of macro imbalances – imbalances within and between nations – as well as about the egregious flaws in policies, regulatory structures, and risk-management practices that allowed these imbalances to take the world to the brink.
Stephen Roach, FT October 6 2009
Repeatedly, we were told by the apostles of yet another New Era that imbalances were to be ignored – whether they took the form of an unprecedented build-up of current account deficits and surpluses around the world or an increasingly virulent strain of asset- and debt-dependent growth in the US.
As someone who warned of the imperatives of global rebalancing as long ago as 2002, I draw comfort that the authorities are now looking back on the era of excess with a more jaundiced view.