| Finanskrisen
Skuldfrågan/ Who is responsible? SIV = structured investment vehicle Financial Crisis |
Rolf Englund IntCom Internetional
Home - Index -
News - Krisen 1992 - EMU - Economics - Cataclysm -
Wall Street Bubbles Banks...![]() Ur Rolf Englund, Den Stora bankkraschen, Timbro, 1983, sidan 15
Bank profits are up tremendously;
so where are all these increased profits coming from? Click to find the answer Banks may have to disclose profits from carry trades derived from 1 trillion euros in ECB loans Basel Bankerna saknade 4.300 miljarder Varje gång ett viktigt förfallodatum inträffat, ända sedan euroländerna gav det första nödlånet i maj 2010, En del av Greklands statsskuld förfaller till betalning den 20 mars. Då ska femton miljarder euro betalas tillbaks till långivarna, och Grekland självt klarar inte detta. Men om euroländernas skattebetalare ställer upp med ett nödlån kan dessa pengar användas – inte till att hjälpa grekerna, men till att lösa de obligationer som förfaller den 20 mars. Det betyder att lånen i praktiken lyfts över från privata placerare (banker, försäkringsbolag, hedgefonder) till Europas skattebetalare. Om nedskrivningen skjuts upp till efter den 20 mars slipper de privata långivarna undan, och förlusten drabbar skattebetalarna i stället. Därför använder sig de privata placerarna av alla tänkbara medel för att övertyga de politiska beslutsfattarna om att nedskrivningen måste ske ”i ordnade former” – vilket betyder ”inte nu, senare”. Men sedan är det dags för ett nytt förfall av grekiska obligationer i sommar, och kan man skjuta upp nedskrivningen då också – ja, då kan de privata placerarna lasta över ytterligare en del av sina innehav på skattebetalarna. Detta har pågått i snart två år, ända sedan euroländerna gav det första nödlånet i maj 2010. Varje gång ett viktigt förfallodatum inträffat har de privata placerarna lastat av en del av sina innehav på skattebetalarna. Och fortfarande får vi efter varje toppmöte höra att nedskrivningen ska äga rum – men inte nu, utan senare, ”i ordnade former”. I dag har nästan hälften av Greklands statsskuld lyfts över på euroländernas skattebetalare, genom EU:s stödfonder EFSF och EFSM, och genom Europeiska centralbanken ECB. En del har också lyfts över på den övriga världens skattebetalare (däribland Sverige) genom Internationella Valutafonden IMF. Frågan är hur länge detta ska fortsätta. Vad finns det egentligen för ekonomiska argument för att EU eller EMU ska låna ut pengar till de medlemsländer som inte har ordning på sina statsfinanser? Vad skulle hända om vi inte ställde upp, utan i värsta fall lät exempelvis Grekland göra en ensidig nedskrivning av sina skulder med kanske tjugo eller trettio procent? Det är bankerna man räddar, inte det grekiska folket - Den stora risken var att Grekland skulle utlösa en kris i italienska, franska och tyska banker. The Violent, Scandalous Origins of JPMorgan Chase Americans like to imagine that the Founding Fathers were virtuous and civic-minded giants bestriding the continent. But many of them kept a sharp eye on the main chance, alert to opportunities for personal profit. The birth of the mega-bank JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) may be traced to two such figures: Aaron Burr, the dark star of America’s early years, and his longtime nemesis, Alexander Hamilton, the first secretary of the Treasury An enormous mismatch of assets and liabilities has lain Retail and private bank deposits in the US, UK, Germany, Switzerland and France have been used to support the expansion by banks such as UBS, Barclays, Société Générale, Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan into global markets. The euro was emblematic – a cross-border project supported by the political elite and by businesses about which many ordinary Europeans had doubts because they could not see what use it was to them. But they tolerated it as long as it appeared to work, just as the growth of global investment banking was regarded as irrelevant to most people’s day-to-day lives. In the cold light of day, it is not clear which is the more depressing: Bankernas stora problem: Ytan = Basen x Höjden All this is supposedly being done to save the euro. Nonsense. It's not actually about the euro. Ännu letar Europa i korrekt samtalston efter en lösning. Grälar politikerna så sker det fortfarande bakom lyckta dörrar. Denna politiska korrekthet är ett slags sista livboj. Men den har samtidigt en baksida av just förljugenhet. The 21 July agreement gives the €440bn European rescue fund discretion to use the money for bank bailouts European banks are “grossly under-capitalized” “In 2008, governments could intervene to sort out the problems of banks,” Brown said at the World Economic Forum in the Chinese port city of Dalian today. “In 2011, banks have problems, but so too do governments.” “The euro cannot survive in its present form, it’s going to have to be reformed dramatically. We are I think at an hour to midnight in the way that we look at this issue.” Regulators should stick to their commitments to implement bank capital rules agreed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision irrespective of opposition from lenders, Trichet said Basel Top of pageSociété Générale, France’s third-biggest bank, has been stirring financial markets once again on concerns about its big holdings of the debt of shaky European neighbors like Greece. Although its shares closed slightly up on Friday, Société Générale’s stock has fallen more than 40 percent since mid Svenska bankers riskabla dollarlån uppgår till 450 miljarder kronor Till skillnad mot sina europeiska konkurrenter har de svenska bankernas kunder inte särskilt mycket pengar på sina inlåningskonton. Det innebär att de svenska bankerna måste låna betydligt mer själva för att kunna låna ut pengar till kunderna. I och med bolånefesten har bankernas sårbarhet kraftigt ökat. De svenska bankerna har lånat cirka 1500 miljarder kronor med hjälp av så kallade bostadsobligationer. Mer än en tredjedel av obligationerna har sålts utomlands. Under finanskrisen tvingades svenska banker att köpa tillbaka sina egna bostadsobligationer som blev allt svårare och dyrare att omfinansiera. Utländska långivare sålde nämligen ganska snabbt svenska obligationer för 120 miljarder kronor. Det tvingade Riksbanken att agera pantbank för bankernas bostadsobligationer. Sedan krisen har bankerna lånat ytterligare 400 miljarder kronor, en siffra som fortsätter att öka. Svenska banker har skulder i utländsk valuta motsvarande på 1,5 gånger Sveriges BNP Den som vill förstå hur det hänger ihop kan läsa en rapport från Riksgälden. Där konstateras att staten inte kan låta en bank gå i konkurs. Om en bank inte kan betala sina fordringsägare hamnar räkningen hos Anders Borg. De fyra storbankerna SEB, Swedbank, Nordea och Handelsbankens samlade balansomslutning (skulder och tillgångar) var vid utgången av förra året 11284 miljarder. Det kan jämföras med Sveriges BNP på 3260 miljarder. Det räcker med att en av dessa banker hamnar i stora svårigheter för att Sverige kan pensionera pratet om tigerekonomi. I Europa är det bara Schweiz, Storbritannien och Nederländerna som har en större banksektor i förhållande till ekonomins storlek än Sverige, där siffran är drygt 400 procent av BNP. Kommentar av Rolf Englund: - Krisen i banksystemet /1992/ utlöstes inte av en klassisk "bank run", utan av ett internationellt misstroende och finansieringssvårigheter på den internationella marknaden, Se även "Sverige i skuldfällan" There are a couple of things to say about Britain’s banks Den danska banken Amagerbanken har begärt sig själva i konkurs. Every intervention so far has pretended that the crisis is one of liquidity, which can be solved by making loans to the troubled banks and governments in question.
Even after Friday’s rebound, the FTSE-Eurofirst 300 banks index is 20 per cent below its February peak France’s banks have stayed flat, trading at 0.64 times. While they are so cheap, it is tempting to treat them as options on a positive outcome to the Greek crisis. Frankfurter Allgemeine; German banks have become the most exposed financial institutions in terms of government bonds from the crisis ridden euro periphery, according to news reports in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung and Financial Times Deutschland on the latest statistics from the Bank of International Settlement (BIS). With holdings in the magnitude of $62bn (BIS statistics are in dollars) the German banks bypassed the French financial institutions which $58bn worth of government bonds from Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain. The German lead is particularly pronounced in Greece with German banks holding bonds over almost $23bn. This does not even take into account the €7.4bn held by FMS Wertmanagement which took over all the bad loans that were previously in the books of Hypo Real Estate (HRE). The irony of all this is that Germany would take the biggest hit if there was the private sector participation that Angela Merkel and Wolfgang Schäuble are always asking for. German banks are among the biggest holders of eurozone sovereign debt German president and SPD chief attack bankers “The causes of the crisis have not been dealt with and we cannot say today that we have realized and effectively dealt with the dangers. Thanks to the numerous state sponsored bail-outs many of the bankers seem “to return to old habits”, Wulff went on. Whoever enjoys benefits must also be prepared to take losses, he said. Tax payers are not prepared to shoulder another multi billion bailout, he warned. SPD chief Sigmar Gabriel was even more blunt. He said the bankers were the beneficiaries of a form of “loss socialism: Whenever something fails the taxpayer jumps in”. It is hard to estimate the exact amount it will cost to recapitalise the European banking sector. I have heard a credible estimate of €100bn-€200bn. This is not a joke No public money was lost in the Fed’s emergency lending programs, Chairman Ben S. Bernanke testified to the Senate Banking Committee in July, 2010. The loans didn’t represent permanent cash given to the dealers and had to be repaid the next day. Citigroup, the nation's third-largest bank by assets, was on the verge of being closed by regulators the week of Nov. 24, 2008 US banks have been bailed out again from huge potential writeoffs by loosey-goosey accounting accepted by the accounting profession and the regulators. The statement that systemic breakdowns are surprisingly rare Inspiring words from preface of Laurence J. Kotlikoff, Jimmy Stewart is dead
Click here The destruction of wealth - that of investors, including more-or-less anyone saving for a pension - has been savage, running to tens of billions of pounds in each case. Between the beginning of 2008 and the end of 2009, the losses on loans made by Lloyds and HBOS combined were £39bn Gordon Brown: The FT has news from the Bank of International Settlements, One German bank, Depfa, an Irish-based subsidiary of HRE, accounts for much for the lending that goes on between Germany, Ireland, Italy, and Spain. Raghuram Rajan, one of the few economists to see the financial crisis coming, Prof Rajan was the International Monetary Fund’s chief economist when he warned the 2005 Jackson Hole conference of central bankers that the seeds of disaster were being sown in the financial sector. His presentation jarred with the self-congratulatory tone of the conference, Alan Greenspan’s last as chairman of the US Federal Reserve. Prof Rajan writes in the book that the critical reaction from other participants made him feel “like an early Christian who had wandered into a convention of half-starved lions”. As the third anniversary of the credit crunch approaches, I have been doing some reflecting on where I went wrong as an economist. As Raghuram Rajan of the University of Chicago Booth School of Business and former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund notes in a thought-provoking new book, the underlying “fault lines” are still with us. Do We Still Need Commercial Banks?
Raghuram G. Rajan Mervyn King says banking must be reinvented Bank of England Governor Mervyn King has attacked the 'absurd' level of risk taken on by banks The world is facing the worst financial crisis since at least the 1930s “if not ever” In contemporary banks, leverage of 30 to one is normal. Central banks should not rescue fools Svenska banker tillhör tillsammans med banker baserade i Australien, Hong Kong och Singapore de bättre kapitaliserade bankerna. Hösten 2008 var hela det finansiella systemet hotat. "Bankerna har god motståndskraft" ”Som banker fungerar i dag är den enda verkliga tillgången förtroende. We need to learn from those countries that evidently did it right. Bank runs have not recurred (after Norther Rock), in spite of the eurozone’s continuing crisis. Queues outside branches as anxious depositors at Northern Rock tried to retrieve their cash: the scenes of Friday September 14 2007 are by now firmly embedded in British banking history as one of the industry’s most shameful episodes. A run on a bank was not seemly in a modern European economy. Whatever the reasons – sweeping government guarantees in Ireland, growing confidence that the European authorities will always be there with a safety net – archetypal bank runs have not recurred, in spite of the eurozone’s continuing crisis. The banks’ undoing in Ireland and Spain – just as in the US earlier in the crisis and, to an extent, the UK too – stemmed from the same root cause: an overdeveloped, overheated and overpriced property market that since 2007 has collapsed in a heap. The supply of deposits is sadly insufficient, leaving the European Central Bank as a vital liquidity supplier of last resort. The use of its emergency facility has increased sharply in the past couple of months – much to the frustration of Jean-Claude Trichet, ECB president, who wants to close that window. Homeowners - the root of all evil? There was a common ingredient in most /Bank/ failures: Bear Stearns and Northern Rock, largely reliant on short-term borrowing, faced the modern version of a “run” when their counterparties refused to roll over debts. Most other banks suffered some loss of confidence, forcing them to turn to funding from the state. In America, the euro zone and Britain, central-bank lending and public guarantees of bank bonds have reached about $2.7 trillion. The collapse of Lehman Brothers has shown the havoc that can ensue when large, interconnected banks implode. After the US, the country with the biggest banking problem is probably Germany.
The decision to guarantee deposits raises large questions. If you do not understand the implications of that, you have not paid attention to what has been happening in the financial sector. I must declare an interest: members of my immediate family had money in Northern Rock. As an individual, therefore, I am pleased. As a hard-nosed commentator, I deplore it. Yet there are other and wider questions. As long as governments cannot – or will not – let ordinary depositors suffer inconvenience, moral hazard runs rife. The answer must surely include tighter regulation: more capital, perhaps an obligation to obtain long-term subordinated debt and specific liquidity requirements. ... The Global Crisis of LegitimacyThe greatest systemic risk is not an economic concept but a political one There were those who were concerned that a united Europe would exist to benefit the elites, rather than the broader public. George Friedman May 4, 2010 at John Mauldin Systemic risk emerges when it appears that the economic elite used the law's allocation of risk to enrich themselves in ways that undermined the wealth of the nation. Put another way, the crisis occurs when it appears that the financial elite used the politico-legal structure to enrich themselves through systematically imprudent behavior while those engaged in prudent behavior were harmed, with the political elite apparently taking no action to protect the victims. The crisis was rooted in the appearance that it was triggered by the behavior not of small town banks or third world countries, but of the global financial elite, who took advantage of the complexities of law to enrich themselves instead of the shareholders and clients to whom it was thought they had prior fiduciary responsibility. We see a similar crisis in Europe. The financial institutions in Europe were fully complicit in the global financial crisis. They bought and sold derivatives whose value they knew to be other than stated, the same as Americans. Though the European financial institutions have asserted they were the hapless victims of unscrupulous American firms, the Europeans were as sophisticated as their American counterparts. Their elites knew what they were doing. This goal always created unease in Europe. There were those who were concerned that a united Europe would exist to benefit the elites, rather than the broader public. There were also those who believed it was designed to benefit the Franco-German core of Europe rather than Europe as a whole. Overall, this reflected minority sentiment, but it was a substantial minority. Halting the financial doomsday machine The doomsday cycle ”Som banker fungerar i dag är den enda verkliga tillgången förtroende. Enkelt uttryckt går det ut på att varje tia som du sätter in på ett bankkonto kan banken förvandla till 90 nya kronor som den an tingen kan låna ut eller som i fallet med HQ Bank, Lehman Brothers eller Bear Sterns satsa i diverse exotiska värdepapper. Limited purpose banking beskrivs i Larry Kotlikoffs bok Jimmy Stewart is dead: ending the world’s ongoing financial plague. How to take moral hazard out of bankingNiall Ferguson and Laurence Kotlikoff, FT December 2 2009 European banks Some banks are becoming dangerously addicted to the medicine the ECB has been administering. They can easily borrow from the ecb and then invest the proceeds in higher-yielding government bonds. Banks have also reduced the maturity profile of their own borrowing, rather than paying higher rates for safer longer-term funds. When all banks make the same decision this is a form of collective madness because it makes the system vulnerable to market disruptions. Moody’s, a ratings agency, notes that the average lifespan of new bank debt has fallen to its lowest level in at least 30 years. Trading, alltså en bank som för egen räkning köper och säljer värdepapper för att tjäna pengar Nine European banks have balance sheets that are larger than the GDP of their country. The Volcker rule – that deposit-taking banks would not be able to engage in proprietary trading, or to own hedge funds or private equity firms – is the first time any government has proposed a sensible structural remedy for the problems created by bailing out banks in 2008. Bank of England provided almost 62 billion pounds (USD 102.9 billion) in emergency loans As a result of Lehman’s bankruptcy, millions of people have needlessly lost their jobs, hundreds of thousands of homes have been needlessly repossessed and trillions of dollars, pounds and euros have been needlessly added to the debt burdens of governments around the world. Why a Lehman deal would not have saved us The Bank of England is examining whether Britain's biggest banks should News that such a move is under discussion at such a high level will send fresh shudders through the UK banking sector, still reeling from the fallout of toxic debt and the credit crunch. It seems that hedge funds have been designated for ritual sacrifice, even though they played no more than a cameo role in the genesis of this crisis.
/Bank/ Nationalisation carries risks, but
As The Economist went to press, the government was in talks with Citigroup over what would in essence be partial nationalisation: the conversion into common equity of a chunk of its preferred stock, obtained in return for pumping capital into Citi last year. This would give it a stake of up to 40%—eight times the holding of Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, the most influential existing shareholder—and voting power to match. "As president Ronald Reagan’s secretary of the Treasury, I abhor the idea of government ownership. Unfortunately, we may have no choice. Beginning in 1990, Japan suffered a collapse in real estate and stock market prices that pushed major banks into insolvency. Rather than follow America’s tough recommendation – and close or recapitalise these banks – Japan took an easier approach. It kept banks marginally functional through explicit or implicit guarantees and piecemeal government bail-outs. US may be repeating Japan’s mistake by viewing our current banking crisis as one of liquidity and not solvency. Most proposals advanced thus far assume that, once confidence in financial markets is restored, banks will recover. As president Ronald Reagan’s secretary of the Treasury, I abhor the idea of government ownership – either partial or full – even if only temporary. Unfortunately, we may have no choice. But we must be very careful. The true balance sheet of US Investment banks John McCain: (not Naomi Klein) Yankee bonds Goldman Sachs and other banks should give up their bank status if they want to avoid the ban on proprietary trading proposed by the White House, Bankerna är ett oligopol som tjänar enorma pengar på att ge dyra lån till företagen. Baselkommittén – De svenska bankernas skuldsättning kommer framstå som enormt hög. Yankee bonds Dutch insurer Aegon said it may buy a small U.S. thrift company We're All Banks Now American Express to Be Bank Holding Company The end of American capitalism as we knew it Do We Still Need Commercial Banks? Låneboomen förvärrades av ett beslut 2004 från den amerikanska finansinspektionen, SEC, att låta de fem investmentbankerna låna ut 40 gånger volymen av det egna kapitalet (mot tidigare 12). Detta regleringsbeslut var katastrofalt. Tre av de fem har nu gått omkull och utlöst en total förtroendekollaps. (Inom parentes kan noteras att John McCain har varit en ledande reformförespråkare rörande såväl SEC som Fannie och Freddie, medan Barack Obama är den senator som fått störst kampanjbidrag från F&F). Beginning in 1992, Congress pushed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to increase their purchases of mortgages going to low and moderate income borrowers. How we have learned the limits to free markets – the hard way The truth is that absolutely free markets and high finance don't mix. Unrestricted financial markets become a machine for blowing bubbles which endanger the stability of the economic system – and threaten capitalism itself. The economics of the corner shop are not the same as the economics of complex derivatives. How U.S. banks sold home equity loans Credit crunch a year on: The losers Total bank exposure to the US sub-prime mortgage market, whose collapse infected wider credit markets and triggered an almost overnight liquidity drought, is still far from clear. The Federal Reserve has put the cost to the bottom line of banks and other lenders of their sub-prime misadventures at $100bn. Taking into account other failed mortgage loans, devalued mortgage-backed securities and general bad debts, the International Monetary Fund said potential losses could top $945bn. It is almost exactly a year since the European Central Bank was forced to inject €95bn into the eurozone banking system Banks with federally insured deposits, which are limited in the risks they’re allowed to take and the amount of leverage they can take on — have been pushed aside by unregulated financial players.
I Danmark tvingas nu Nationalbanken, alltså landets riksbank, att ingripa för att hindra Roskilde Bank att gå omkull. : Nationalbanken och en bankorganisation, bildad för att just ta hand om banker i svårigheter, tar över. Det kommer att kosta omkring 5,5 miljarder kronor. Bankernas problem har bland annat sin bakgrund i den negativa utvecklingen på den danska fastighetsmarknaden där huspriserna stadigt är på väg neråt och har varit så en längre tid. Det tillsammans med dålig kreditvärdering ger bankerna förluster.
De nordiska bankerna har tillsammans en utlåning på 450 miljarder kronor i Baltikum. Misslyckat försök göra en pudel Most people have noticed that when the music stopped – as Chuck Prince might have put it – some of the dance partners left the floor with their pockets stuffed with cash, while others went home to lock up the houses they no longer owned and post the keys back to the bankers. By accepting much of the blame and proposing various measures to get its house in order, the banking industry hopes to avoid further regulation. It will not succeed. The political atmosphere has become too febrile for that: the mob is at the gates baying for justice. Fed bailout of Bear Stearns Contrary to popular belief, the stock market crash of 1929 wasn’t the defining moment of the Great Depression. Mr. Bernanke and his colleagues at the Fed are doing all they can to end that vicious circle. We can only hope that they succeed. Otherwise, the next few years will be very unpleasant — not another Great Depression, hopefully, but surely the worst slump we’ve seen in decades.
The financial system is a subsidiary of the state. Banks are machines for taking liquidity risk. Like a 1930s bank run Bankers, like gangs, just get carried away Groups routinely demonstrate behaviour that few if any members would choose to adopt as individuals. Look at teenage gangs, soccer hooligans, religious zealot Before the mysteries of structured credit there were the mysteries of witchcraft; before investment banks used initial public offerings to turn dotcom concepts into billions of dollars alchemists claimed to turn base metals into gold. Shared values and beliefs create a group identity. No matter that the beliefs may be absurd or the values contemptible: that Salem was not besieged by witches, the US was not threatened by communist infiltration, that greed is not good and that suicide bombers will not be greeted in paradise by 71 virgins. The very improbability of the belief, the unacceptability of the values, reinforces their social function; these factors distinguish the real members of the group from the less committed. *
It is only halfway through November but I think we can already declare the winner of the 2007 Quote of the Year competition. Människan är ett flockdjur. Det förklarar kanske vårt intresse för Paris Hilton? The Rising Risk of a Systemic Financial Meltdown: A fundamental question arises: If the US suffers a recession in 2008 or 2009 it will not be due to an industrial decline or an oil price shock. It will be a recession that began in the financial system. The response of the general public is confusion, tinged with horror, at how intangible finance can impinge on their daily lives. The rogue trader who cost SocGen €5bn - FT Bankerna har uppträtt vårdslöst de senaste tio åren och har riskerat allas välfärd. Vem som helst kunde få vilket lån de ville så sent som för tre år sedan. Rogue Trader (Paperback)by Nick Leeson - Amazon Nobody wants to see a repeat of the 1930s when bank failures ushered in the Depression. While the authorities are happy to leave banks alone when times are good, they are quick to intervene at the first hint of crisis. The moral hazard is clear; it is not just rogue traders, such as Jérôme Kerviel at Société Générale, who are given huge incentives to take risk. Their bosses are too. One might well describe investment banks as hedge funds backed by an implicit government guarantee. Two points shine out about the financial system over the past three decades: The bigger point still, however, concerns macro-prudential regulation. As William White of the Bank for International Settlement has noted, banks almost always get into trouble together. Central banks create an upward-sloping yield curve whenever banks are decapitalised, thereby offering a direct transfer to any institution able to borrow at the low rate and lend at the higher one. A financial sector that generates vast rewards for insiders and repeated crises for hundreds of millions of innocent bystanders is, I would argue, politically unacceptable in the long run. Förra året tjänade de fyra storbankerna drygt 91 miljarder kronor Anders Borg kräver omedelbara reduceringar av bolåneräntorna. European Union states have underwritten their financial sectors SEB:s vd Annika Falkengren Kreditförluster har också slutat att existera inom SEB och istället får banken nu tillbaka pengar som tidigare har klassats som förlorade. En del av förklaringen är att det går bättre i Baltikum för SEB. Full text*
SEB:s vd Annika Falkengren avstår från sin bonus för 2008. But bank profits are up tremendously; so where are all these increased profits coming from? By the way, what ever happened to all those Toxic Assets that were on the banks' books? Oh, they no longer count since they do not have to mark to market anymore Thanks to Ben Bernanke, banks can borrow as much as they want for practically nothing Det finns jätterisker att det inte fungerar. Tyska och brittiska banker har stora fordringar på Irland One can interpret the intransigence of the German government and its EU allies in two ways. Alternatively, policy makers in Germany – and in France and Britain – are scared to death over what Ireland restructuring its bank debt would do to their own banking systems. If so, the appropriate response is not to lend to Ireland – to pile yet more debt on the country’s existing debt – but to properly capitalize their own banking systems so that the latter can withstand the inevitable Irish restructuring. The two largest creditors to Ireland are /banks in/ the UK and Germany, The key issue in Europe now is not the merits of the single currency but the parlous state of its banking system. För att räkna ut den verkliga avkastning som tillexempel en köpare av statsobligationer får på sina utlånade pengar brukar man tala om realränta, det vill säga räntan justerad för inflation. The unpopularity of very low interest rates leads to what is known in financial circles as “the search for yield”. Today’s rock-bottom yields, however, have less to do with disinflation and more to do with providing fuel for an asset-based economy that promotes unsustainable wealth creation and a false confidence in perpetual capital gains. Are zero interest rates a subsidy to banks? In a Vox column, Axel Leijonhufvud argues that low Central Bank interest rates are an implicit subsidy for banks, which can borrow money for free and place it in on interest-earning treasuries, thus making a profit. This policy of implicit subsidy, at the expense of the taxpayer, is pursued in order to recapitalize the banks without having to take an equity stake (a politically costly move). Paul Krugman answers that low (short-term) interest rates are not necessarily a subsidy: a bank borrowing from Fed to buy long term treasuries earns more than it pays, but immobilizes money for longer. Both authors agree, though, that there is downside risk to this strategy: a return to normal interest rates could trigger losses, and optimistic numbers on bank earnings may not be taking sufficiently that possibility into account. Full textEurozone banks have rushed to take out The ECB said 523 banks asked for the funds, which will be lent The scale of Wednesday's bail-out for eurozone banks by Draghi's European Central Bank (ECB) should simply confirm worst fears. * Bankernas bolånemarginaler har ökat kraftigt. Interest rate cuts work their way through to the real economy by a number of transmission channels. The first, second and third beneficiaries of the Federal Reserve’s pending helicopter drop of cash will be banks, not ordinary people or companies. Cui bono How to solve the financial crisis? The gap between short-term interest rates and long-term bond yields is extraordinarily high.
That allows banks, in particular, to borrow at low rates from the central banks and invest the proceeds in government debt; In fact, banks have virtually ceased to function as financial intermediaries since 2008, preferring to use the zero cost of money provided by the Fed to finance purchases of Treasury securities instead of supplying loans to households and small businesses. *
Transmission channels Wall Street bonuses fell to $33.2bn, the New York state comptroller said. De fem största amerikanska investmentbankerna har betalat bonusar om totalt 39 miljarder dollar, This huge monetary expansion perpetrated by the Federal Reserve has contributed to the biggest speculation in every conceivable asset category and has been accompanied by unprecedented hubris, greed and outright fraud. In 2007 there was one economic event of such overwhelming significance that it dwarfed all the others - the credit crunch. - Who was to blame?, Roger Bootle The collapse of the modern day banking system, Mike Whitney Most estimates put the eventual tally for defaults by America’s subprime borrowers at $200 billion-300 billion, The Economist Foreign funds lead $21bn US bank rescue Citigroup and Merrill Lynch turned to foreign investors for an unprecedented bail-out on Tuesday, saying they would raise a total of $21.1bn in fresh capital – mainly from outside the US – to shore up balance sheets devastated by the subprime mortgage crisis. Citigroup also unnerved investors by warning of losses to come from consumer loans as it revealed a 40 per cent dividend cut, a $9.83bn fourth-quarter loss, $18bn in subprime-related credit writedowns and remaining exposure of $37bn to subprime mortgages. Citi, Merrill Lynch and UBS could face $10 billion in further writedowns tied to last week’s downgrade of bond insurers Ambac and MBIA, S&P downgrades Ambac, MBIA If September 11, 2001 was the day that we had to reassess our ideas about America's role in world politics, Lehman bondholders could lose $110bn Why the Fannie and Freddie bail out should not be repeated in Britain With one bound, they were free. The pound plunged, interest rates dropped - and the roof did not fall in. Last week, as the British Government floundered and the credit crunch ground on, the US government effectively nationalised 50pc of the mortgage market and in the process increased the US government debt by 40pc of gross domestic product. And the markets did not blink - or rather, they smiled. Nightmare on Wall Street Lehman Bros files for bankruptcy What if Lehman files for bankruptcy and nothing much happens? Street Prepares for Worst As Lehman Deal Stalls Still others can't believe there won't be a last minute compromise. One person with knowledge of Sunday's deliberation's called it "a big game of chicken" with all sides digging in their heels. ![]() Barclays has pulled out of talks to buy most of Lehman Brothers, the BBC has learned. Lehman Brothers' stock, which fell another 13.5% Friday, is down 94% so far this year. Lehman Brothers Barclays was last night considering a direct plea from Hank Paulson, the US Treasury Secretary, to assemble a cut-price rescue bid for Lehman Brothers Paulson, the former head of Goldman Sachs, has urged Barclays and a number of other large financial institutions to intervene in the Lehman crisis, which is threatening the future of one of Wall Street's most venerated businesses.
Lehman Brothers plunged 45% - its shares ended down $6.36 to $7.79 Can Lehman raise the capital it needs?
Lehman Brothers is raising $6bn, expects a $2.8bn loss The bank's public offering of common stock and convertible preferred stock will be aimed at mainly US investors, analysts said. - UBS balansomslutning är nästan fem gånger så stor som Schweiz BNP UBS tillhör den grupp banker som gjort de allra största förlusterna på bolånekrisen i USA. Och banken har tentakler i hela det globala finanssystemet, vilket gör att en kollaps skulle få stora konsekvenser överallt, även i Sverige. UBS will raise 6bn Swiss francs ($5.3bn) from the Swiss government. Credit Suisse also said that the Qatar Investment Authority was among the group of global investors that had helped the bank to shore up its finances. UBS reported a loss of $329m for the April to June period, despite hopes it might break even in the quarter. UBS seeks $15.1B in new capital UBS writedowns have reached a staggering $40 billion in the past nine months, the largest reported by any bank to date. Switzerland's Federal Banking Commission (EBK) is to investigate how UBS became one of the banking sector's worst victims of the credit crunch, BBC UBS faces rebellion over fund injection, FT How foreigners are buying up our banks It's not too harsh to conclude now, in fact, that bankers essentially threw away their families' life savings on reckless real-estate gambles and that with their shares down 50%-plus and their capital bases in tatters, they're now lying in the proverbial gutter begging for a hand from passers-by. Brother, can you spare a billion? The purchases were made via convertible securities that pay stunning yields of 9% and 11%, which essentially classify UBS and Citigroup as junk-bond-level credits. A mere 5.4% decline in the value of Citigroup's assets would make Citigroup insolvent. This isn't just a mortgage or housing crisis. What we are witnessing is essentially the breakdown of our modern day banking system, Goldman Sachs, began reducing its inventory of mortgages and mortgage securities late last year.
Why Do Financial Firms Take Too Much Risk? The Next Dominos: Banks Gone Wild It is only halfway through November but I think we can already declare the winner of the 2007 Quote of the Year competition. It is Chuck Prince, the former chairman and chief executive of Citigroup. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. plans to file a civil suit against at least three former Washington Mutual executives, Washington Mutual JPMorgan Chase will acquire deposits and some branches Under the government take-over, the value of WaMu’s common equity and preferred shares would be wiped out Under the deal, which was shepherded by federal banking regulators, JPMorgan Chase will acquire all the banking operations of the Seattle-based WaMu, as well as its assets and financial contracts. The Office of Thrift Supervision shut down the bank on Thursday and named the FDIC as receiver. WaMu is the 13th bank to fail so far this year. WaMu är en S&L - en släkting till Swedbank Washington Mutual - What the heck's happening to our financial system? The most sobering thought about the credit crunch so far is that it's happened without anything approaching a recession. Difficulties in the financial system could slow the economy and that in turn that would create new losses at the banks.
What we saw this summer is something we've seen before and will undoubtedly see again. The sell-off was predictable and avoidable. A mere 5.4% decline in the value of Citigroup's assets would make Citigroup insolvent. The US subprime lending fiasco and its repercussions on Northern Rock have brought back questions about the banking system - questions such as “What is a bank?” and “What is money?” The US subprime lending fiasco and its repercussions on Northern Rock and international credit markets in general have brought back questions about the banking system that most macroeconomists had hoped were over and long forgotten. The confidence of what are called, rather disdainfully, “retail depositors” is not the only problem of the world monetary system, but it is still the bedrock on which everything else stands. Outside the US, deposit insurance is rarely complete and there are usually delays before reliable cheques denominated in central bank money duly arrive. In the UK it is only since October 1 this year that the Financial Services Compensation Scheme has been extended to cover eligible deposits of up to £35,000 and the new official discussion paper leaves open the possibility of raising the amount. But the implications of sweeping guarantees have not been digested. They have the dubious feature of bringing questions such as “What is a bank?” and “What is money?” into practical politics. In fact, the fractional reserve system was severely queried by some US economists in the aftermath of the Great Depression when one-quarter of the US money stock disappeared almost overnight – a more important event than the better-known 1929 stock exchange crash. Henry Simons, author of A Positive Program for Laissez Faire, proposed the creation of pure deposit-taking institutions holding 100 per cent reserves whose assets had to be held in currency or Federal Reserve deposits. So, barring a break-up of the US or similar disasters, a depositor could always get his or her money back and quickly. Other financial institutions, whether or not called banks, would carry on paying interest and looking for more profitable investments. But the ordinary citizen would know that he was on his own if he invested in them and learn that higher returns came with higher risk. We urgently need a more open approach than that of the City of London figures who oppose bail-outs and government support for all other industries but condemn the Bank of England for not doing secret deals to rescue threatened financial institutions. How do the big banks differ from Northern Rock? Sir, I would like to thank the FT for your reports on the issues relating to the credit crunch and its potential impact on the global economy. In particular I was shocked to read about special investment vehicles (SIVs) and “SIV-lites”, off-balance-sheet vehicles used by big banks essentially to circumvent banking regulations on maintaining reserves against lendings, and sound liquidity management, such as not covering long-term commitments with short-term fundings, which everyone with a little bit of knowledge would know is risky to the survival of a bank. What is the difference between the big banks and Northern Rock? Now a more shocking development is the talk about creating a seeming master SIV by the big banks endorsed by the US Treasury. How could the banks be allowed to perpetuate such self-destructive activities, which the SIVs and SIV-lites have proven to be? The public sector subsidises the banks risk-taking. It does so because banks provide a utility. Mervyn King, governor of the Bank of England, The “Minsky moment” in financial markets – the point where credit supply starts to dry up, The decision to guarantee deposits raises large questions. Mervyn King, governor of the Bank of England, For decisions on how to intervene in markets, however, Mr King bears responsibility. The only reason for intervening, then, would be “strong grounds for believing that the absence of ex post insurance would lead to economic costs on a scale sufficient to ignore the moral hazard in future.” Since then Mr King must have decided that the threat to the financial system posed by the unwillingness of banks to lend had become too dangerous. By advancing three-month money against mortgagecollateral,the Bank has, as a result, abandoned two of its principles for acting as lender of last resort. Consider, not least, that banks exposed themselves to the risk of illiquidity from which they expect a public rescue, at no charge. Mr King’s “mistake” – what critics call his “inflexibility” – was the view that banks should no more enjoy a rescue than other businesses. Fortunately, the Bank’s provision of liquidity is not yet free. Let Mr King stick to his guns on the penalty. If not, still more dangerous crises will come. |